American Association of Family and Consumer Sciences (AAFCS) Practice Test

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the AAFCS Exam. Engage with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complete with hints and rationales. Gear up for success!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What is a potential downside of the power-coercive strategy?

It requires constant incentives.
It can lead to unrest among members.
It relies on peer support.
It promotes high performance.

The correct answer is: It can lead to unrest among members.

The power-coercive strategy is characterized by the use of authority and power to achieve compliance and drive change within an organization. One potential downside of this strategy is that it can lead to unrest among members. When individuals feel that they are being coerced or forced to comply with directives without their input or buy-in, it can result in resistance, dissatisfaction, and decreased morale. This unrest can manifest as conflict, high turnover rates, or a toxic work environment, undermining the intended goals of the strategy. The other options reflect different aspects that do not inherently signify a downside of the power-coercive strategy. The need for constant incentives is more closely related to reward-based strategies rather than coercion. Reliance on peer support typically aligns with collaborative approaches, and promoting high performance could be an outcome of targeted strategies but does not specifically address any drawbacks associated with coercion. Thus, the potential for unrest stands out as a significant concern within the power-coercive approach.